Quote from: ibininja on January 29, 2019, 06:08:52 PM

Quote from: em777 on January 29, 2019, 05:49:07 AM

Quote from: phantam on January 29, 2019, 01:10:27 AM

Quote from: cryptossi on January 28, 2019, 10:07:56 PM

Quote from: phantam on January 28, 2019, 02:54:26 AM

I honestly prefer AMA's over even things like whitepapers i just find them to answer directly a lot more of the questions that actually matter while papers tend to have a lot of stuff that i could case less about, while ama's allow people to target the things that matter to the investors

Yes project's whitepapers are very technical and sometimes contain too much information for the average Joe (myself included) AMAs get to the point and it is useful for community members to find out information about their favourite projects. Neuroneum should think about running one soon.

HA at least i'm not the only one that feels that way, i've glazed over a few times when trying to get through some projects whitepapers and especially some of the more eastern white papers that have some language issues, so getting straight to the point from the horses mouth is so much better.

one of the first thing i do is head straight to their telegram channel with questions after that i can start reading the whitepaper some whitepaper are too technical to read

I honestly like technical papers since it reflects how capable the team is. I think the information on the website convey the information for non techies? but it would be great to have a simplified version of course.

But projects should learn to be more precise with their whitepapers. It doesn't have to be overly complex and length doesn't matter at all. For example, the original Bitcoin whitepaper was only 9 pages long and I guess you would all agree that this was more than enough.