Quote from: RobertStadler on February 01, 2019, 05:35:31 AM

Quote from: dampier007 on January 31, 2019, 12:08:31 PM

Quote from: RobertStadler on January 28, 2019, 07:51:21 AM

Quote from: dampier007 on January 28, 2019, 04:42:53 AM

Quote from: RobertStadler on January 28, 2019, 04:15:47 AM

Quote from: bustedsynx on January 25, 2019, 11:44:37 PM

Quote from: zahidmoon on January 25, 2019, 12:12:13 PM

Quote from: bustedsynx on January 24, 2019, 08:53:45 PM

Quote from: Neurocrypt on January 14, 2019, 05:55:56 PM

I HAVE NOT RECEIVE BOUNTIES FOR DECEMBER AND JANUARY?

You need to submit KYC documents and anti-money laundering details. After approval you have to pay some $120 per receiving address. Actually it's 1 ETH. Only then you can receive bounty. Missed bounty payments will not be compensated.

this is not good at all for receiving bounty and investment dividend needs 1 eth to pay for confirmation KYC
this is the first project that is doing KYC over 1 eth address
i think its better to gives dividends only on KYC confirmation and not charge 1 eth per one eth address
also atl token price is stable in btc and upto 500 sat but its a lot lower then its ICO price. what about it?

They insisted on that 1 ETH fee thing. Yeah, it's quite expensive for the so-called "processing" fees. But no one is calling out on them for this. First I thought they did this because they might need extra funding, but only a few paid. So it must be to prevent distributing the whole 33% of the coin supply to bounty hunters who they think will just dump it all.

It is common practice to collect fees for using the platforms like ATLANT. 1 ETH is not a fee required specifically from bounty hunters, it's a flat fee to get whitelisted. Bounty hunters just happen to be using the platform, thus they need to get whitelisted same way as any other community members.

It looks like a Scam. There are many participants in the bounty campaign for which the payment 1 ETH will exceed their remuneration. They have done their job, why should they pay to get paid for their work?

Let me forward you my previous message, which you have probably missed:

It is common practice to collect fees for using the platforms like ATLANT. 1 ETH is not a fee required specifically from bounty hunters, it's a flat fee to get whitelisted. Bounty hunters just happen to be using the platform, thus they need to get whitelisted same way as any other community members.

This can be called anything, but in fact it does not change anything. In my opinion, the project deliberately puts various obstacles in front of the participants of the bounty campaign not to pay them

Let me repeat the explanation from my previous message:

It is common practice to collect fees for using the platforms like ATLANT. 1 ETH is not a fee required specifically from bounty hunters, it's a flat fee to get whitelisted. Bounty hunters just happen to be using the platform, thus they need to get whitelisted same way as any other community members.

They don't want to use your platform. They want to be rewarded for their work. It was you who came up with the conditions that were not there during the course of the bounty campaign