Quote from: TooDumbForBitcoin on February 01, 2019, 10:17:43 PM

Tron is plagiarized, centralized (how much nodes there are?) and overhyped just by marketing team (they spent more on marketing then on a development). So EOS centralization isn't so bad actually

Exactly. TRON is just a copy of other prominent crypto projects. There's no uniqueness or originality in TRON compared to other prominent cryptocurrencies like Ethereum and EOS. All I've seen is hype among TRON enthusiasts and the foundation itself, without delivering true development or innovation. Right now, they have most of the attention of the market, because of its BitTorrent acquisition. The newly proposed BTT promises to improve torrenting itself.

However, it's only a matter of question whenever TRON would be capable of supporting massive interactions in its blockchain network with BTT. The users of BitTorrent are greater than those of TRON or most other popular cryptocurrencies. Implementing a token within the TRON blockchain without proving its maximum capacity first, could be disastrous for the TRON network over the long term. This might slow down TRON's transaction throughput by a long shot, in case BTT becomes viral.

On the other hand, I believe that EOS has a better chance of becoming widely accepted in the mainstream world, due to its real development and innovation. Compared with TRON, it's not overhyped, yet it has delivered positive results every step of the way. Of course, EOS is somewhat centralized, but it's still much better than TRON, IMO. Hence, if you're looking for a quality cryptocurrency project, with good prospects, then EOS would be the right choice for you. Just my opinion