Smart contract is smart. It wasn't called SMART contract for no reason. The idea of "to replace lawyer" is a no for me although the use of smart contract is really efficient and can alleviate lives. It was made to make things easier and not to totally replace lawyers.
Smart contract is smart. It wasn't called SMART contract for no reason.
not sure if you already hear about other brands that was also called "smart" but they arent actually smart . one of them are just a brand of telco or telecomunication ( network service provider )
thats why i think smart contracts arent really smart . smart contract was just a brand name .
The idea of "to replace lawyer" is a no for me
same here . no one can replace the actual/real lawyers . they studied for many years just to got that profession . we must respect them .
It was made to make things easier and not to totally replace lawyers.
yes that was thier purpose , they didnt mean to replace anything . they just help us to live easier in the form on their service .