Quote from: nutildah on February 03, 2019, 11:17:22 AM

Quote from: TECSHARE on February 03, 2019, 10:58:59 AM

Quote from: nutildah on February 03, 2019, 10:33:25 AM

Quote from: TECSHARE on February 03, 2019, 09:55:23 AM

What you are advocating for can never be done because, see the rules, the rules are how it is done, the rules say it therefore the rules must stay that way and can never be changed. End of discussion, everyone please move along nothing to see here.

Good, glad to see that we can agree on something, and that the system was initially intended to be highly flexible and open to interpretation -- not nailed down to what a few members believed it should be used for.

Is everyone else seeing this pattern of substituting pith and snark in lieu of any logical arguments completely?

Dude. I'm pointing out that the system was initially designed to be open to interpretation. You're saying it needs to be changed. OK, so changed to _what_ exactly, and on _who's_ authority? You've probably stated your case a hundred times, and nobody cares. Its because you want it changed to what _you_ want. You're like a child who throws a temper tantrum when they can't have their way.

It is not just what I want, it is what lots of people around here have wanted for a long time, but unfortunately any time they make an objection people like you dismiss them as a scammer or an alt, therefore it falls to others around here with a reputation to speak up about it. You act like I am going to get some prize out of this. I will not (other than a more functional forum). What I will get however is a gang of stalkers looking for anything they can to use against me. Don't worry I am sure your mob of inquisitors will dig something up to accuse me of sooner or later. If not I am sure they will just invent something.

I made several logical arguments which no one seems to be able to address here and here. It just seems to be a continual cycle of people who disagree with these points making personal attacks and dumb comments, then acting like there is nothing but dumb comments when I respond. Maybe post something other than dumb comments? I did. You try.

Quote from: ScumBuster on February 03, 2019, 11:19:21 AM

Quote from: TECSHARE on February 03, 2019, 09:55:23 AM

What you are advocating for can never be done because, see the rules, the rules are how it is done, the rules say it therefore the rules must stay that way and can never be changed. End of discussion, everyone please move along nothing to see here.

Quote from: TECSHARE on February 03, 2019, 10:58:59 AM

Is everyone else seeing this pattern of substituting pith and snark in lieu of any logical arguments completely?

>Posts snark in lieu of a logical argument
>Complains about snark in lieu of a logical argument

Here come the sock puppet supports now. I guess everyone who criticizes the trust police is a sock, an alt, or a scammer, but if you are using the socks it is perfectly acceptable right? It is almost like you are running out of logical arguments and need to start bringing in "new people" in order to try to maintain your preferred narrative without looking like the dog piling mob that you are actually a part of.

Quote from: Lauda on February 03, 2019, 11:23:44 AM

Quote from: ScumBuster on February 03, 2019, 11:19:21 AM

>Posts snark in lieu of a logical argument
>Complains about snark in lieu of a logical argument

Quote from: nutildah on February 03, 2019, 11:17:22 AM

Dude. I'm pointing out that the system was initially designed to be open to interpretation. You're saying it needs to be changed. OK, so changed to _what_ exactly, and on _who's_ authority? You've probably stated your case a hundred times, and nobody cares. Its because you want it changed to what _you_ want. You're like a child who throws a temper tantrum when they can't have their way.

There's a simple solution to this: ~TECSHARE and place him on ignore like I did. If you re-read my previous interaction with him here, then you can clearly see that he is either full-delusional or has some strong hidden agenda (and no, KingFool this isn't a fallacy). The thread is moving in the wrong direction because of stuff like this.

Yeah, please do ignore me. It will make it much easier for me to tell everyone else who is trying to have a logical debate why this system is a problem without knee jerk interference from the peanut gallery. I am not sure what purpose advocating excluding me from trust lists accomplishes other than you demonstrating yet again you use the trust system as punitive punishment for anyone who dares criticize your behavior, and the behavior of your clique.

Of course I must be delusional or have some hidden agenda right? Anyone who disagrees with you is automatically guilty and deserving of retribution are they? Thanks for once again demonstrating you should never be in a position to judge others.