Quote from: Ribak1992 on February 05, 2019, 05:14:53 PM

do not be offended but your project when compared with similar, looks very weak. in common and most importantly investors with money will not exactly exceed your numbers for profit and distribution. they simply can not be implemented.

Can I ask which aspect looks very weak? We always value constructive feedback as we want Tratok to be as successful as possible for the benefit of everyone.
Without an ICO, the product is already funded and demo released seven months early and lead by a team of fortune 500 executives (I have not seen another team where more than 60% of those involved have actual experience creating billion dollar revenue streams or introducing new products to new markets e.g. the smart credit card). In addition to a growing community and strong B2B developments, I believe we are actually in a stronger position that many of the others.

Let's consider two scenarios:

A.) Party A has raised millions in public funds, had 90% of shareholder value disappear, has no product, no ability to progress, are undergoing investigations and has upset and let down a lot of people. This is 99.9% of the industry.
B.) Party B is a registered entity which has given every token in circulation away for Free, launched seven months early, is realizing increased participation and adoption and has a clearly defined plan that is constantly being meet ahead of schedule. This is Tratok Ltd and a few others.

Bias aside, I think in every single case, nobody with a neutral point of view would pick A over B.

Tratok has smashed through its milestones and is embarrassing the others who have sat idle because it is quite the opposite of weak. It is strong. All the experts who said it couldn't be done have gone silent on LinkedIn.