Quote from: Raja_MBZ on February 06, 2019, 11:47:56 PM

Quote from: mindrust on February 05, 2019, 04:37:59 PM

Taking away satoshi's coins is no different than what happened with ETH&DAO in the past. Immutability is bitcoin's core feature. If you take away satoshi's coins and redistribute them, you'll just fork yourself away into another shitcoin which nobody uses.

So... did immutability win in the case of ETH&DAO? Roll Eyes

Ethereum did the right thing and people agreed to it, see the current situation of Ethereum Classic for proof. Immutability didn't succeed!

Quote from: mindrust on February 05, 2019, 04:37:59 PM

If you take away satoshi's coins and redistribute them, you'll just fork yourself away into another shitcoin which nobody uses.

Quote from: mindrust on February 05, 2019, 04:37:59 PM

If a group of person can decide to take one person's stash and redistribute them, then they can decide to take mine later too.

Contradiction detected

Ethereum is a shitshow they blindly followed what Vitalik said. (Not all though, that's why etc exists) It is because eth holders are morons without any self conscious. I got zero eth and probably never gonna have any.

Vitalik made a bad decision that day and it will haunt him till the end of his days. That's why he is desperately saying that he has no influence over the eth development no more which is another lie. As long as he is alive and around, vitalik is eth.

That's why we don't have a vitalik/satoshi here.

We got a theymos but he is responsible for the forum;) not the coin.