Quote from: mu_enrico on February 07, 2019, 04:36:43 PM

Quote from: yurez83 on February 07, 2019, 03:40:23 PM

Plagiarism is the use of my photos without my knowledge and the main thing is editing them as my own, applying inscriptions.

Wrong.

Quote

Definition of plagiarize: to steal and pass off (the ideas or words of another) as one's own : use (another's production) without crediting the source

Source: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/plagiarizing

Your copyrighted work can be used without your permission if it classified as fair use.

Quote

What Is Fair Use?
In its most general sense, a fair use is any copying of copyrighted material done for a limited and transformative purpose, such as to comment upon, criticize, or parody a copyrighted work. Such uses can be done without permission from the copyright owner. In other words, fair use is a defense against a claim of copyright infringement. If your use qualifies as a fair use, then it would not be considered an infringement.

Source: https://fairuse.stanford.edu/overview/fair-use/what-is-fair-use/

Your problem isn't about copyright, but about privacy and doxing.

That is, in your opinion, the use of my author's photo for the purpose of causing moral damage and trolling is a "Fair Use"?

Secondly - the use of my author's photo does not imply any manipulations, editing and changes, which automatically becomes plagiarism. I did not give the right to dispose of them as my own, not property.

Thirdly, I have the right to demand the removal of my intangible property only because it is unique and is not already present on any resource. No reference to the source of information.

Quote from: Theb on February 07, 2019, 04:35:05 PM

Quote from: yurez83 on February 07, 2019, 03:40:23 PM

Quote from: Theb on February 07, 2019, 03:38:03 PM

~snip~

Plagiarism is the use of my photos without my knowledge and the main thing is editing them as my own, applying inscriptions.

Dude I just explained in my first post why there is no plagiarism going on with your claim. Let me explain it more clearly if a criminal is identified by authorities and they found some of his pictures in his social media account, do you think that they will need the consent of the criminal first before they take your picture and produce copies of it? Of course not the criminal is a wanted fugitive and they don't need to ask anymore permission to use his pictures to be shown to everyone.

Now let me explain to you.
1. These users who insult and accuse me of being illegal are just people like me.
2. If you or they have facts of my fraud, then you can publish them.
3. If there are no facts, this is called slander and is prosecuted.
4. Only the police can use my copyrighted things with the permission of the court.