Quote from: eddie13 on February 08, 2019, 09:31:02 PM

Quote from: guybrushthreepwood on February 08, 2019, 02:06:15 PM

that's what they get taught in school and there's a whole lot of whitewashing of their history and demonizing of them as peoples.

You think that is what is being taught in western school? You are terribly mistaken..
In school they teach white guilt and extreme PC culture at the expense of demonizing science..

https://www.rt.com/news/448732-james-watson-titles-revoked/

Quote

Ninety-year-old Nobel Prize-winning scientist James Watson has been stripped of his honorary titles by a leading American research institution, after doubling down on his controversial conclusions linking race and intelligence.
Despite nearly half a century service to the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (CSHL), Watson, a world-renowned geneticist, lost all of his honorary titles of Chancellor Emeritus, Oliver R. Grace Professor Emeritus and Honorary Trustee, for refusing to retract his own scientific conclusions.

when asked more than a decade later whether his views about race and intelligence have changed, he told the PBS documentary they havent.

Not at all. I would like for them to have changed, that there be new knowledge that says that your nurture is much more important than nature, the scientist was quoted as saying in a recently previewed PBS documentary, titled American Masters: Decoding Watson. Theres a difference on the average between blacks and whites on IQ tests. I would say the difference is, its genetic.

Watson rose to international scientific fame in 1953 after helping discover DNA's double helix structure with fellow geneticists Maurice Wilkins and Francis Crick. In 1962, the team was awarded a Nobel Prize in Physiology for their discoveries concerning the molecular structure of nucleic acids and its significance for information transfer in living material.

If this was based on white supremacy it would never be admitted that East Asians have higher average IQs than whites..

And no white supremicist would ever admit that infact Ashkenazi Jews have the highest average IQ scores of all peoples..

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashkenazi_Jewish_intelligence

Quote

Ashkenazi Jewish intelligence, often referred to as the "Jewish genius",[1][2][3][4] is a subject that explores the perception that Ashkenazi Jews on average have a higher intelligence than all other ethnic groups and excel disproportionately in many fields. Although it is generally accepted that there is a significant statistical difference in intelligence between Ashkenazi Jews and other ethnic groups, there still remains the question as to whether the difference is due to genetic factors or not. Because the relationship between human races and intelligence and the relationship between genetics and Jewish descent are both highly controversial, it has been an occasional subject of scientific controversy.

The average IQ score of Ashkenazi Jews has been calculated to be within the range of 108 to 115 under some studies, which is significantly higher than that of any other ethnic group in the world.

So am I a Jewish supremacists or Asian supremacists?

How is genetic IQ science white supremacist if whites don't even win and are topped by asians and jews?
What that is is PC Slander.. (calling me a white supremacist)

Quote from: guybrushthreepwood on February 08, 2019, 02:06:15 PM

You will find that a lot of low IQs go hand in hand with poverty and a lack of education

Correct..

Quote from: guybrushthreepwood on February 08, 2019, 02:06:15 PM

I'm sure if you took the IQs of white American's living in trailer parks and in poverty you'd find they wouldn't score very well, but we wouldn't blame their race for that.

Correct.
Poorer whites "living in trailer parks" tend to have lower IQs than rich whites living in affluent neighborhoods.

This is not blaming any race for anything
Their are very high and very low IQ examples of people from all races. Their are plenty of very low IQ asians and high IQ blacks, but this is about averages
and the average IQ of a country correlates almost perfectly to the success of that country..

Quote from: Chinocshyp on February 08, 2019, 04:59:04 PM

Yea. The Chinese lends money to African countries. Then, when we can't pay back, they take their money back in form of our natural resources.

They are loan-sharking African countries and will control your entire country, not just take your oil..

Quote from: dippididodaday on February 08, 2019, 06:45:45 PM

PS: What is IQ of the Greenlanders? Why are they left out of the scores? Grey is such a dull color.

This one shows Greenland.
It must have been omitted from the other one.

Not all datasets are exactly the same but they all show a very similar pattern..

Quote from: blackhelmt on February 07, 2019, 04:07:12 AM

Unfortunately, almost everyone there does not have enough ability to manage these things.

Quote from: squatz1 on February 07, 2019, 01:44:25 PM

it's a lot easier said than done when it comes to establishing a country that can hold itself up.

Quote from: cizatext on February 07, 2019, 05:27:43 PM

the African as we have today is a continent with confused leaders and blind followers

Denying the science is going to do nothing but keep Africa as poor as possible.
The only way you will ever find a solution to the poverty problem in Africa is if you recognize the true causes in order to develop a solution.

Go ahead and call me a Jewish supremacist if you can't handle the truth..

Quote from: CryptopreneurBrainboss on February 07, 2019, 02:46:07 AM

Africa is being raped.
we get treated like slaves and our wealth is been enjoy by other continents.

Most importantly OP..
Stop blaming it on everyone else!

Obviously it has very little to do with the OP, but one thing we can all agree on: IQ is a score on a test, for which the average score receives the IQ score of 100. Also without a doubt is that practice increases test scores, and that different tests yield different scores. How useful such indicators might be for a given discussion is unclear. Generally speaking, we can be clear that those who wish to put fancy labels on test scores and use them out of context disregarding these basic facts are also likely to score poorly on such tests.

In some cases people from different geographic locations have on average practiced different skills more than others, and sometimes people with different physical features have on average practiced different skills more than others. Perhaps an interesting statistic, but what are the conclusions? There are very few conclusions to be drawn here. Individuals still certainly need to be tested separately from one another for any skill you might wish to test, as it is also beyond dispute that any statistical average from a geographical location or physical attribute can most definitely not be used to determine the score of a given individual on a test.