Quote from: Teraboy on February 08, 2019, 10:32:41 PM

Quote from: [btc]YSG on February 08, 2019, 10:28:17 PM

Maybe none of them should be considered as a cheater, Bounty Hunter with multiple accounts too will have to perform multiple tasks, while Dev team who extend ICO too want the best for the project.

Both, we must back again to the agreement that created by the project itself. If they are delaying the distribution that means if they were cheating us if they are not giving any reason for that. Remember about those hunters must follow the agreement too.

We in the activities of the ICO just need clear rules of the game. Without this, ICO teams will always use their abilities to abuse them. Bounty hunters do not have the ability to deceive as much as the ICO teams do. For now, almost all claims against bounty hunters consist in using multi-accounts and writing substandard messages. Bad quality messages may not be counted by managers, and several accounts do not actually cause any harm to the ICO team. This problem is contrived and can only cause discontent of the part of bounty hunters who earn less from it.
I see the solution to this problem only in the state regulation of ICO activities. To regulate, first of all, the rights and duties of ICO teams are necessary.