Quote from: robin.nimiq on February 09, 2019, 03:19:40 PM

digging not profitable for honest miners why?

free cloud digging + burst attacks result in unprofitability for 99% of miners. only attackers and diggers with free electricity make a few bucks.

There is no free electricity....
There is no free cloud. Test cloud environments (offered by aws, azure or google cloud) do not allow for mining, read their terms....
Even if there was free electricity or cloud for mining, those using them would be honest miners and everyone would be able to do it, so it's fine as well....

Quote from: coinfanatic on February 09, 2019, 03:54:44 PM

Proof that "Normana" is Marvin Wissfeld

This is not a proof, this is just something you made up. Many of your points a provably wrong
- I was mostly active in Discord, not Telegram, so that is why you see little activity from me on Telegram. I only go to Telegram if people in Discord write about it.
- My bitcointalk account is from December, "Robin drama" started in January. I indeed created my Reddit account lately to publish the survey there, but that was also before the "Robin drama".
- My total number of posts is 56, not hundreds. You and the other sockpuppets indeed went in the hundreds in total.
- I am not defendng team excessive salaries because I don't think they are excessive. The team stated that the highest salary (probably Robin or Philipp) is around $90/h with the average at $60/h. In my experience, that is not absurdly high in the IT field in general and according to studies found in the internet actually low for crypto currency industry.
- The survey was not fake, in fact some of the respondents faked data (a few claimed to be from Telegram or Discord but in fact came from BitcoinTalk), but there is nothing to do against that. I can also share the insight that people that came from BitcoinTalk on average had a way worse opinion than people coming from any other source. You have no way to proof that the survey is fake, I can provide as much as you'd like to proof the survey is real. So if you can say why you think the survey is fake (beside that you don't like its result), please go ahead so that I can debunk your claim.
- I think my knowledge of code is not very high. I know the details from a technical perspective, but I am neither JS nor Rust dev (I go with C/C++ instead) so I haven't looked to much in the code.

Funny thing is: You repeatedly asked for refund from the team, but refused to give any proof of being eligible for refund to me. If you'd think I am a team member, you should be willing to give me a proof - so my best guess is that you don't even think yourself what you are writing here.

Warning: yuluxugi32132, nimiqshitcoin, coinfanatic, andrewjaxx, john.btc, sasha.new, Scamiq, robin.nimiq are sockpuppet accounts, proven liars and FUDers. All of them were only created this year and only for the purpose of spamming this thread (check their profile). They claim substantial losses due to their Nimiq investments, yet fail to provide any proof that they actually invested. Rumors say that they come from another crypto project, assuming they are a direct competitor to Nimiq. Don't expect anything mentioned by them to be true. If you want real insights, check out Nimiq community channels (Discord, Telegram).