Quote from: tech72 on February 09, 2019, 05:13:15 PM

Quote from: gigabyted on February 09, 2019, 04:58:49 PM

Quote from: tech72 on February 09, 2019, 04:52:30 PM

Quote from: gigabyted on February 09, 2019, 04:29:07 PM

Quote from: tech72 on February 09, 2019, 04:00:12 PM

How many repetitive coin project that we need?

Btw, my friend own zano.com domain name.

He hold this domain name for 1 big fintech project.

He and his group even reg trademark the "zano" name.

Hope it not gonna get conflict with this project.

Since you're both share similar name.

They already spend hundred of k to develop 1 fintech mobile application that they were ready to launch at any time.

I will show him this thread.

Zano is a short catchy name, like many in crypto, its not unusual to clash with real world names, a quick search will tell you that.

Here zano is used by a kickstarted project for drones: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/torquing/zano-autonomous-intelligent-swarming-nano-drone
And here you can find a trademark registered for a food company: https://trademarks.justia.com/856/42/zano-85642647.html

As for being repetitive this aint just a plain fork from a github repo like most coins. I wouldn't call MimbleWimble a repetitive coin project just like i would call zano one either, they wrote most of the code in both case.

Heres one for GRIN: https://trademarks.justia.com/776/37/grin-77637877.html

https://www.grin.com/

You get the point i guess!

You can create a restaurant company and called it uber, no problem with that as uber trademark only cover in "mobile, transport" area.
Just an example.

It's similar to zano. the trademark only cover in financial, mobile app, software, website, i.t related area.
So you can use that name for restaurant, food and beverage with no issue.

And what about GRIN? It's a tech company as well. This argument apply to so many projects, ive been hearing that for years.

As for DeepOnion i tend to disagree, but this is personal opinions, so i'm ok with you believing its very good and me believing it aint. As for creative devs, i would look closer to this team background if i was you, you cant really find more creative than these guys. I would really recommend you dig deeper several years back in crypto (like 2013-2014).

You dont understand, it just like i buy PayPal.org , and create financial related - blockchain project.
What do you think PayPal reaction gonna be like?

I own so many coin onion, eth, blocknet, btc , ltc, vert, nano, iota, neo, neblio like 20-30 different coin not just onion since 2013.
Believe me, people are not desperate and needs for another coin. There are already thousands of coin out there.

This is not just another coin this has been in development for 4+ years by developers that are highly talented and with a track record of creating successful, innovative projects.

I suppose only time will tell which becomes the next PayPal and which becomes the next pets.com.

We are intimately familiar with the history. I suggest you dig deeper.

you might really like what you find.