Quote from: mikeywith on February 10, 2019, 12:56:12 PM

Quote from: cryptohunter on February 10, 2019, 11:15:07 AM

Also you argument is broken because of course once you have red tags there is nothing to lose by speaking out... it is prior the tags that the red stifles free speech. There can be no denial of this.

since day one for me on Meta i keep on saying that most DT member don't know how to use the trust system, i have argued with many of them,i remember once in your topic i argued with suchmoon for a good period of time and i kept telling suchmoon and everybody else that i think the way they use the trust system for non-trust related stuff is terrible, nobody gave me any negative for that, and i will always keep fighting for what i think right.

unlike you i did not point fingers, i did not go out of my way to accuse every person for conspiracy, i do not discuss my disliking on every single topic including those that are not related to the topic, i am pretty sure you got tagged simply for the way you handle your stuff and not just because you disagree to them.

TECSHARE does more disagreeing than you do and nobody tagged him for that, many other members do ,you do have every right not to agree with any member here, but don't be annoying. demand your rights in a proper manner.

Well again you are incorrect.

You can not use anecdotal experiences to make refutation of a proven point. Please review my most important thread of the year to understand why and continue to discuss it there.

Of course if people are allowed to red trust for anything including the dislike of lemons then they will be influencing free speech.

Again you are making false accusations. Please provide evidence of

1. accusations I made without providing grounding and case to substantiate these reasonable statements.

2.where my opinions are voiced off topic and are not relevant.

3. I think you will find that i got my red tag for the reasons i stated already.

Lauda came to ME first calling me LIAR 2 X and would NOT provide any evidence or grounding. I did not search that snake out.
I then was fully within my rights to tell him in what ever manner i choose that if he continued with his MANNER that i will encourage others to review his post history (where i know full well he is a PROVEN liar) That was why i got red trust. He says he can call me a liar 3x without any evidence and then if i tell him to stop it else I will encourage others to review his post history I am a blackmailer. What a bunch of crap. He is trying to use red trust to silence me and allow himself to continue to call me a liar over and over with no evidence.

If you follow the time line with in the merit threads here you will clearly see they became hostile first and their MANNER was hostile first.

I have no care for my MANNER after I am given red trust for defending myself and suggesting people look into the truth of the matter.

Red trust is not for taming peoples Manner after they have been red trusted by a liar.

The trust system and the merit system are systems of control with no mandate and no criteria and as such have drastic powers to crush free speech. This is not even deniable except by a person that does not understand how they operate.

Please review the thread of the year to read and clearly understand how you are trying to disagree with an observable presentation of how they currently function. Sure, bring in criteria for merit and trust, and you can perhaps say this power over free speech has been reduced or removed.

You do realise that in opposing me and my views you are simply fighting against the formation of a transparent, fair and equal system. What else do I ask for other than a clear mandate, clear criteria that is applied fairly to all persons?

If you can find a post where my goal is anything other than that present it here right now. If not then as I say opposing what I say is you fighting to retain a system that is unfair, unequal, open to abuse and that allows the crushing of free speech. This is undeniable. The only reason I hope you persist with this is because you do not fully understand how the systems of control function.

I make no apologies what so ever for getting annoyed for my treatment. I am always nice to those that are nice to me. But be disrespectful to me and be hostile to me.....then sorry I am not going to keep being nice.

I have been here many years and fought huge scams. I am 100x more trustworthy that these pieces of shit on DT that supported these shady scamming projects and lied for financial gain. They are not going to be red trusting me and getting away with it. Sorry for keep going on about it but until something is done then as boring and annoying as it may be for those unaffected by my ill treatment... expect to hear more about it. I have put huge effort to protect others who have been treated unfairly but for myself I will even go that extra mile.

Can you imagine knowing and proving someone is a proven scum bag liar and scam protector and watching them lecture others on lying or supporting "possible scams". Then punishing people and ruining their accounts as they choose. No way. Look at these known sneaky sock puppet trolling sig spammers lecturing others on financial shit posting. What is this place coming to to knowling sanction such crap. Then even having them admit in black and white, ..yes I will red trust you for presenting facts that reveal my friends are scum.

Sorry for the long post but if you have read this and still do not get it then at least it is on record i tried to furnish you many times with the details.