You do realise that in opposing me and my views you are simply fighting against the formation of a transparent , fair and equal system
yes cryptohunter anyone who disagrees with anything you have to say is a fighting against a fair system.
let me correct you on this, I totally agree with your intention of trying to enforce a fair trust system, i bet most members do, but i totally disagree with how you go about achieving it, let's just say we both are fighting the same fight with completely different weapons.
you are more focused on individual members, you are wasting a lot of time on them, for an instance, you have to bring this Lauda thing at every possible post, me on the other hand don't know who lauda is and i honestly don't give a fuck about him/her, and without having to read much, i know he/she must have used the trust system terribly in many cases, including yours, but I also know that he/she must have tagged a good amount of scammers and this is the main reason why other people trust him/her, this applies to many other DT members.
and i personally would rather see lauda or any DT member for that matter being forced by theymos to use the trust system in trust related matters only, instead of seeing them off the list.
my approach is to encourage proper use of trust system ,whereby anybody would look at anybody's negative score knowing those are either scammers or at least potential scammers , rather than having to read stupid feedback that are based on personal issues.
and i am certain that eventually we will get there.
also i would like to point you out to something >
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5103988.0do you really think that removing every single member who trusts lauda from DT list will make the forum a safer and better place ?
sorry ,i just can't seem to agree with how many of you are you going about making this a better place.
well it seems the goal is the same with one difference.
You advocate making it fair but leaving someone proven a liar and trust abuse inside the system so that their tags are not removed from possible real scammers (these could be added by others could they not)
I advocate making it fair but getting untrusted persons out of the system.
I will accept your goal gladly over what we have now hence I believe you have good intentions. However the new rules need to completely eliminate any room for proven abusers to abuse in future and prior abuse removed.
I don't actually hate lauda as many say that I do. I just do not want red trust used as a weapon or have the potential to be used as a weapon against any persons other than scammers.
I said at the start when you first disagreed with me I do believe you want a fair system in the end. At least much fairer than it is now.
You have to accept though that wrong doers even proven wrong doers find it hard to accept punishment from other persons proven to have committed wrong doing in the pasts. It just goes against the grain.
Still yes the goal of a fairer system will be more than good enough for me. Same rules applied to all persons equally. Red trust for scammers and those directly related to scamming only.
I am encouraged many others want a fair system even if they feel I should not post so much. I will leave it here for now.