Quote from: Hhampuz on February 13, 2019, 08:47:51 PM

If anything this shows you've sounded like a broken record for the last 4 years.

Please point out the flaw in my argument. The fact that I have been on point for 4 years does not in any way prove that my argument is flawed.

Quote from: suchmoon on February 13, 2019, 08:37:37 PM

Quote from: TECSHARE on February 13, 2019, 08:26:54 PM

Quote from: suchmoon on February 13, 2019, 08:21:04 PM

So... you posted a frivolous trust rating, whined about being pressured by TPTB into removing that rating, got booted out of DT, but now you want to coerce everyone into posting ratings the way you want them to be.

That doesn't sound to me as rational or even sane.

Define frivolous for me please.

Posting a rating for someone in retaliation for posting in your thread and using a fake "risked" amount is frivolous, to put it mildly. Perhaps "irresponsible" suits you better?

I and corrected the value, making the rating perfectly valid. It seems to me you are more interested in character assassination than discussing the crux of the issue, the ambiguous state of the trust system and the rules in general. That is to say if the trust system had an objective standard of evidence of theft, violation of contractual agreement, or violation of applicable laws none of this would have ever been an issue to begin with.