Quote from: jbreher on February 15, 2019, 07:50:20 PM

Quote from: Last of the V8s on February 15, 2019, 06:23:41 PM

Quote from: jbreher on February 15, 2019, 06:06:06 PM

Quote from: infofront on February 15, 2019, 04:54:11 PM

Would you be honest enough to criticize Craig, if you knew he was wrong?

Sure. He's already made a lot of bone headed statements already. No, I'm not going to enumerate them.

Let's do some of them anyway

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Craig_Wright

Wright's claimed PGP key was provably backdated. [1][2]
He was paid millions of dollars by nTrust to 'reveal' himself as Satoshi (this is for those who think he lacked motive)[3]
Signature claimed to prove him to be Satoshi was worthless. [4]
Second claimed "signature" was also an obvious forgery. [5]
N-th claimed "signature" was yet another obvious forgery. [6]
Faked blog posts showing his early involvement in bitcoin. [7]
Craig Wright is apparently using his fame to run an advance-fee scam.[8]
Incorrectly calling it "Bit Coin" several times in 2011. [9]
Gross technical incompetence. [10][11][12]
No evidence of any C++ proficiency.
Plagiarizism[13]
If Craig Wright really was the creator of Bitcoin, the proof would be trivial. We see an example by Charlie Lee the creator of Litecoin[14]

Again... Relevance as to the matter on JPM potentially infringing on nChain patents?

nobody gives a shit about that part except as a sideshow
that's why it was edited out; we moved on to the part where you do everything you can to support this fraudulent actor and minimise his crimes