Quote from: denam on February 17, 2019, 09:51:46 AM

But they are not censoring anything in their telegram. I am regularly watching what is being discussed there and everyone is free to say anything. It is clear that Opacity team isn't interested in this thread anymore. This is up to people how they can keep active this thread with cons or pros comments. No one will come here to reply for anything.

I will use your comment for the ist post. At the end, you can decide for yourselves if this seem like a team that will censor info in a moderated forum. Mind you this was done in pm, so i could only imagine what it would have taken and how soon it would have taken to be banned in public, while discussing real issues in a non docile manner.

this was the towards the end of me explaining that it was unethical to not accept some responsibility for the loss accrued by those that purchased this token from decentralized exchanges post a snapshot that had limited announcement visibility

If we are all pushing for greater adoption of decentralized options (which it seem they might divert from, with the whole null on tangle for improved usability quip) then we have to ask ourselves, if the affair with the anon dev, the ensuing dump, the loss from shl investors (i imagine is life changing for some) would be tolerated in a regulated space. We keep yelling about adoption without been willing to the take the loss and adopt an attitude that brings so forth.