Quote from: Windhanenergy on February 25, 2019, 07:29:05 PM

Hi there, I see there have been some doubts about our legitimacy. We have started a project thread, you can come over and ask us anything, we will be glad to answer your questions.

In regards to the claims in this thread --->

Fake team: At the time we hadn't publicly launched yet so, yes, our site contained some placeholder pictures and names. The ones who had real people behind them are the already on-boarded team members. Richard Reinert is a well-known guy in the London finance scene and you can watch an interview with him on our website. As for Martins Paegle - he is both on our and AsicVault team. Since we are fully launched, all the team members and advisors are visible on the website.

Plagiarism: We talked to the copywriter. The white paper was constantly being polished for the launch, therefore, the copywriter put a placeholder text of the same idea just to work on it later. We talked about that with him, said it wasn't a good thing to do. Currently, we have checked the white paper with Grammarly and it shows that our copywriter has corrected himself.

You might ask why are we approaching potential advisors with an unfinished, unpolished website and the answer is simple - to save a bit of time by doing these two things simultaneously. We may have made a mistake with that one, but overall we have nothing to hide. Come on our thread and we will answer all your questions:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5114243.new#new

It's so unfunny that I can use my previous messages to reply.

Quote from: bubbalex on February 22, 2019, 02:18:01 PM

~
We have seen hundreds of examples, when the team began to defend itself after the accusations, can we just believe to their words? If I launch a scam tomorrow and answer all the accusations - the site was made at an outsourcing, WP too, the fake team is a stock photo from a template for the site and now Ill fix everything, were not scam, but I will not give you any proof. How do you see it? This is of course extremely convenient - you were accused of scam - you will fix everything and there will be no evidence left. In any case, if you are so keen on development, you should have hired an experienced person, it is really difficult to invest money in a project that makes such mistakes, this is not professional, in the current market it is almost impossible to succeed in raising funds, especially after such accusations.

Quote from: bubbalex on February 25, 2019, 07:14:29 PM

~
Is it worth it to create a topic with quotes from all teams that told tales that team on website was in test mode, but online, although this is absolutely not the case and they are just scam. Another Scam ICO trying to steal people's money. Is there really a school of sample answers to scam accusations somewhere? Because it seems like all scam projects are learning in it Grin

AsicVault scam accusations - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4800954
AsicVault thread - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2706485
Launched by - cuteman (This user recently woke up from a long period of inactivity.)
Archived - https://archive.is/3NiU0
AsicVault Website - https://asicvault.io/
Archived 10 months ago - https://archive.is/tJOKi
Archived Today, in case they made changes, I didn't checked whole website - https://archive.fo/506J1
Windhaenergy new ANN - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5114243
Archived - https://archive.is/8YQvn