Quote from: BitcoinBaBa on February 07, 2014, 01:58:52 PM

Quote from: nyc77 on February 07, 2014, 01:31:31 PM

Quote from: BitcoinBaBa on February 07, 2014, 01:17:05 PM

What's the deadline given by Ken for trading to commence?

The quote below is from a week ago. Since then, he is holding our shares hostage until he's made another 100 BTC selling Ukyo's shares and excluding the rest of his shareholders from trading.

Quote from: kslaughter on January 31, 2014, 06:44:48 PM

Quote from: nyc77 on January 31, 2014, 01:45:53 PM

Quote from: kslaughter on January 31, 2014, 01:15:12 PM

As soon as I get the verification program up on the server, then as investors get verified we will start sending the list over to CT to create the accounts which will include the shares. So, once the accounts are created then trading will start.

Ken, WHEN is this happening!?

Could you commit yourself to at least this one date in front of your shareholders?

Yes, I will be working on this the next few days. I don't see to many problems getting it running ASAP.

He has been saying that for more than 2 months now.
Why not set a plausible deadline and stick to it. It'll surely calm some of the uncertainty here.

Also I urge Ken to hire a good PR. Your updates are often vague and oddly put which often causes confusion and create misunderstandings . You really really need to hire someone for better communication.

This exactly! He said he was going to be hiring a PR firm last year, and as you can see, that obviously did not happen. One of the many things Ken said that he would do, that he did not. Communication is one of the biggest problems that ActM has. Yes, he is becoming a little more transparent by attempting to answer direct questions from shareholders, but Ken is notorious for putting his foot in his mouth. A clear example of this is his off the cuff statement about possibly moving directly into 20nm. With a PR firm, Ken would basically email his statements to them, and then they would present it in the most attractive way. Granted, you can only dress up so much bad news, but some of the statements Ken has made in the past have not necessarily been bad news, but rather not well thought out.

For example:

Quote

We are also thinking about going to a 20nm custom chip and skipping the 28nm, if we can get it produced fast enough.

would have translated into something like

Quote

We are announcing today that ActiveMining is entering into the early stages of development of a 20nm chip. While we have no specifics at this time as to when we can expect this chip to enter into the market, we want to insure our investors that we are constantly looking forward to ActiveMining's position in the Bitcoin Mining race, and we are fully aware that expanding into 20nm technology is an inevitable step that will have to be taken at some point in the future for us to maintain a competitive edge.