Quote from: Ibizugbe1 on March 06, 2019, 12:17:28 PM

Quote

There are a lot of reports

.
You ought to have agreed that updating of stakes were stopped at the middle of the campaign, and this only affected signature campaign, which you know was a technical move to ensure signature can't be removed, this must have been ill conceived.

Quote

Time is required to add all stakes and verify users

don't think 31 days is too much for this? even Amazix uses just 7 days for verification or less.

Quote

I don't understand why Users expect tokens immediately

You have left the core of the thread, which is holding signature hostage for 31 days, on this thread, I didn't write that participants want tokens, on your telegram you well spelt out when the token may likely be distributed.

Quote

Please, don't write false information. Otherwise, cases will be forwarded to lawyers

Only a chicken will be scared with such empty threat. Just administer justice and all these dragging won't happen
I have a reservation for now, will release further findings as time goes on.

The awful reply on your telegram has always been "do as you want" when asked about the removal of signature, this clearly shows you want workers to loss their stakes. You need to come out with fairness.

The rules were clear and available for 2 months in a telegram. There was information that the signature campaign would be checked after the end of the bounty. If someone didn't like it, he didn't have to take part in the campaign.

Every week, I updated facebook and twitter campaigns, it was about 40 pages of forum bitcointalk...

The team works all the time.

If you have too much time and want to help, check all telegram campaign users. There are 5,000 of them...

Why "do as you want" ? Because users don't understand the rules and ask the same question 1000 times.