Quote from: stompix on March 07, 2019, 06:12:45 PM

Quote from: Harlot on March 07, 2019, 03:55:46 PM

Your post would really be helpful if you provide links on what you are talking about. Because members like me cannot grasp on what you are accusing to theymos.

Exactly, he is talking about a member, some members, some report, a member, thousands of members but not one single example or at least a link to a topic where this "crime" has been committed.

Quote from: Thule on March 07, 2019, 09:13:04 AM

You are punishing now high ranked members for plagiarism back from 2014.

Who are those members?

Quote from: Thule on March 07, 2019, 09:13:04 AM

Suchmoon clearly searched hard to find anything to attack that member who has over 10k posts and the only thing she could find were posts back from 2014 with some lines of plagiarism

Again, tell people who and what and when and how.
Seriously, I have no f word idea what happened.

But to sum it up, at this point with all those accuses against theymos (with proofs as you claim) and you still haven't left negative feedback? Do it!!!!!! Cool

Redsnow I believe, although I though he was granted a reprieve with just a sig ban? so not too bad. A real enthusiast will not care about not having a sig. I think Theymos tries not to let the scum bags here get their way fully on ALL things.

I don't think anyone here is suggesting Theymos has done anything to do with a scam or is he done anything that could even require a trust related feedback. So not sure why you would say that?

Thule and others including myself are perhaps just hoping Theymos can start to see how it appears from our POV that are collateral damage to the long game that he is perhaps counting on and perhaps giving it a bit of a better start to speed things up a bit. It can certainly look like this system is starting off in a very one sided way but the worst part is the observable double standards of those that are DT members (not theymos and a few others). It is quite sickening to watch them lecture others on lying and financially motivated posting. I mean thats without them red trusting persons telling the truth about their wrong doing.

@LFC bitcoin - your post is again observably double standards. You are missing the point.

If others can merit on a political basis then that should go for anyone. NOT that my posts come under that essentially anyway I say they are merit deserving regardless.

Also bring me my posts that have had merit applied then we can compare these to your posts or others that get politically motivated merits for posting misleading net negative junk. If you are sure that they should not have been given merit by Stingers. We can compare.

If stingers can be removed then get foxpoop, suchmoron and most of the other merit merry go round banned too.

More like if we look at your own merit fans and recipients and the gangs we will see a lot of them all riddled over your top fans and recipients that is why you are protecting them.

The thing you are missing is they have histories riddled with proven scammy pasts full of lies and double standards and signs of greed and sneakyness. I'm sorry but when this all gets ironed out it will show for historical you were on the wrong side of this. You may not be the worst, but supporting observable scum and untrustworthy manipulators and schemers is nothing to be proud of.