Quote from: TECSHARE on March 09, 2019, 05:13:08 PM

Quote from: nutildah on March 09, 2019, 05:13:00 AM

Quote from: TECSHARE on March 09, 2019, 04:55:45 AM

Quote from: nutildah on March 09, 2019, 04:53:23 AM

More evading the question.

I didn't ask for the opinions of others. I asked for you to tell me why you personally think that rating is not valid.

Your exact words were these:

Quote from: TECSHARE on March 09, 2019, 04:30:13 AM

Explain to me what makes this rating invalid please.

I thoroughly complied with your request. This is entirely based on my opinion, which holds in regard the opinions of others.

Edit: BTW, thanks suchmoon, I appreciate your kind words, and your earlier guidance in matters surrounding what DT should be used for.

Really, you haven't. The post you claim answers my question is a purposely overly inclusive list of other people's opinions, then your version of the narrative. You have not once in your own words told me why you think iCEBREAKER's rating for you is invalid. If any one is curious, nutilda refuses to answer this question because they know I might later hold them to those same standards that they themselves held to others. Nutilda can't have that no can they?

Because trust should be reserved for matters directly involving finance: the exchange of goods and services for crypto or money. It shouldn't be used because somebody said something that you disagree with.

But I already know any answer I give you will not suffice. I should have stuck to ignoring you; you're clearly trolling me at this point. I think everybody else can see what is going on here. This is what you do, you talk in circles until your "opponent" gets bored and moves on, and then you can declare victory.

It would be in your own best interest and reflect your own endlessly-explained belief system if you removed iCEBREAKER from your trust list. Not doing so is clearly hypocritical on your part. Have a terrific day.

/end of discussion