Quote from: cagiv1984 on February 08, 2014, 04:12:51 AM

Quote from: shtako on February 07, 2014, 06:35:32 PM

Quote from: cagiv1984 on February 07, 2014, 01:19:30 AM

Digitalcoin AND CryptoAve should learn a very very important lesson from Worldcoin and Scharmbeck. Being tied too closely together can spell disaster for the coin under certain circumstances. Initially it should be fine for DGC and CryptoAve to be very close, assuming there are not major problems with CryptoAve, but I suggest that as time goes on, they distance themselves from each other a bit (maybe by CryptoAve supporting a couple of other coins among other things), because there is always the chance that the regulators will make new laws that will prohibit CryptoAve, or any other similar entity from operating the way it wants, and this could be a huge problem if tied to close to digitalcoin.

It's still unclear what is going on with Scharmbeck, but I am anticipating they will either dissolve, or there will be a longer delay until they are set up. They have been having problems with depositing funds while in beta. I have been following this very closely. Now, and in the next couple of weeks is a huge opportunity for DGC, if it can step up its game and start marketing, with a new website etc..! There are alot of angry Ex-WDC supporters out there, which could be easily convinced to come aboard the DGC ship. I have been a supporter of both coins for a while, but seeing all the problems with WDC now, and with all the money i've lost because of it, I've had enough with the coin. All aboard the DGC ship!!!

Sharmbeck were suspected to be fraud from the second they announced it. A pump and dump scheme to benefit the insiders. I have not read similiar accusations against cryptoave so i don't think you can compare the two.

Anyone can scream FUD about anything at anytime on the internet. I have seen no conclusive evidence that Scharmbeck is a fraud. In fact I believe it to be legitimate. At least a couple of them are good people! Enough Derailing of the thread........It is very easy to compare Scharmbeck to CryptoAve. The both are planning to a crypto to fiat transfer bank. I'm not sure of all the features that CryptoAve will have as I have not followed it as closely as Scharmbeck.

At the risk of repeating myself....When a currency is tied to a specific outcome such as WDC was to Scharmbeck, it can be very dangerous if a deadline is missed, or if there is not timely communication, or the planned event falls through, etc... Especially when there has been extensive marketing through many outlets connecting the currency to the corporate entity. This can be extremely beneficial in the short term, but I would argue that it is very risky in the long term, considering all the regulatory possibilities among other things.

On a slightly separate note...In my opinion DGC needs a foundation with a few very active members, and needs much more marketing without being tied to CryptoAve directly via potential events! There are sooo many crypto enthusiats on bitcointalk, that would be the best place to do it. If DGC is going to succeed, it needs ALOT more people actively marketing and creating new services for it. Almost nobody knows about it....it's lost in the sea of shitcoins.

It really is time to start pushing DGC. It has to be everywhere in order to get anywhere.