Quote from: Token Williams on March 13, 2019, 03:47:03 PM

Quote from: viljy on March 11, 2019, 05:53:54 PM

Quote from: Jarvis Edge on February 28, 2019, 01:47:19 PM

Quote from: viljy on February 28, 2019, 11:50:24 AM

Quote from: Jarvis Edge on February 28, 2019, 07:32:51 AM

Tomorrow, we will close the presale

https://medium.com/jarvis-edge/its-still-better-to-buy-during-the-ico-than-on-an-exchange-here-s-why-cfb37486d828

From this article, we can conclude that your tokens cease to be impersonal. That is, tokens acquire the properties of some preferred and ordinary shares, as payments will be differentiated depending on the period of purchase of tokens by the owners. You consider using token standard erc721 in order to organize this rather complicated system of payments. But it seems to me that this excessive complication is not the best solution in this case...

We are open to receive any input from the community so if you can tell us more about your point of view, it will be very appreciated

Initially we wanted to whitelist address within the smartcontract. It is the easiest solution at the moment. The idea of the token comes with the idea that this token would be an asset that could be transmitted.

How is it possible to do this? To exchange tokens, each pack of these holders for 1 token ERC721? And they will all have different returns and different prices. But how can they then be divided into parts if the holder wants to sell the part? Or maybe I didn't quite get the idea.

Maybe try one of those new ERC-tokens companies like Polymath and Harbor are offering. Will try to find their respective ERC-numbers

https://blog.polymath.network/erc-1400-a-library-of-interoperable-security-token-standards-4c4e632cdfbc