I let your post stand. Even when I find your conclusion premature and insinuating.
Where in my post did I state anything at all, let alone a conclusion? I merely asked for your input on the publicly available documentation concerning the state of the LEO organisation and the the founder of LEOcoin, who remains arrested in Pakistan and unable to leave the country.
the opinion of Mr- Kamran, not as proven facts.
According to the court documents Mr Kamran presented a raft of evidence to support his claims, chief among them that Dan Andersson issued and sold more LEOcoins than the company could possibly fund, evidence that was accepted by the court as legitimate, as opposed to that submitted by LEO which was not even signed.
Even LEO's own submission to the court asserted that the company was both unable to fund legal representation in its defence AND that LEO is "insolvent or at high risk of insolvency
LEO is the entire MLM structure behind LEOcoin and they have declared in their own words that they are broke.
I find your conclusion premature and insinuating.
How about when it is the company's own own conclusion?
Surely you must have something to say about this by now?