Quote from: mikegogulski on September 03, 2011, 11:05:15 AM

Quote from: MiningBuddy on September 03, 2011, 10:49:35 AM

Quote from: mikegogulski on September 03, 2011, 10:41:40 AM

Quote from: MiningBuddy on September 03, 2011, 10:37:26 AM

Mike, there is no thinking on this one. Ben is clearly in the wrong, hook line and sinker.
See this: http://www.leg.state.or.us/ors/164.html

Hey, Buddy... are you seriously asking me to not think here? And then asking me in the next breath to think about some law code from (where?) Oregon?

Yes Mike, Ben (the theif) is located in Oregon hence the pasting of Oregon state law. I'm from the UK so I don't know how you guys handle things over there but from the information above it seems almost perfectly clear Ben has broken Oregon states law.

Ummm, dude, seriously. So, that's why we ALWAYS go flying off to file suit in defendant's jurisdiction, right?

Doesn't matter, I'm putting you down in my "irredemably dense" file until you can find yourself bothered to examine your request above that I not think.

Don't worry about it, something has obviously gotten lost in the interweb translation somewhere.
I didn't request you don't think about it, it was more of a "no-brainer" moment as you will, whereby from reading and examining the information provided on the Oregon State Legislature website it clearly defines Ben's actions as law breaking.
I'm no legal expert and I won't even pretend to know anything about law, but when facts are clearly shown to you that Ben has broken Oregon State law surely there must be repercussions of his actions and justice must be brought forward to compensate intersango?