Quote from: The Pharmacist on March 14, 2019, 05:33:46 PM

Quote from: DireWolfM14 on March 14, 2019, 05:27:37 PM

I agree that there are a lot of coincidences; profanity in the usernames, similar coding style for the two sites, similar business models, similar administration... but again, non of that is irrefutable evidence.

Whether or not the evidence is strong enough or not--which it seems to be, and I would definitely believe these are alt accounts--the main question in my mind is whether any DT members would act on this information or not. Merit abusers generally don't get tagged anymore unless the abuse is extremely blatant, though I can't speak for what Vod would do. My point is that most of these threads that purport to catch alt accounts sending merits to one another are just wasted time & energy, because the outcome is usually that the accounts don't end up with any tagging whatsoever.

I think threads should only get started when there's extreme abuse going on and when the evidence that accounts are linked is very strong. Neither of those things are the case here, but I would certainly be interested in what others have to say.

It seems you misunderstood my allegation. I was not creating this scam accusation because someone sent big merit to other. I used that just to link a scammer's account with another. I understand that is not an irrefutable evidence to link two account. Hence, I was looking for proof of blockchain. Now I have got them and provided it above.

Please note that, bitcoinfuck is already established as a scammer and marked by DT. I am hereby requesting DT members to take care of pussyhunter6969. Whether bitcoinfuck should receive more -ve trust is on to the DT members.