Quote from: Bunsomjelican on March 20, 2019, 10:12:28 AM

Quote from: MainIbem on August 16, 2018, 03:16:54 PM

Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

You've reached the rank of Sr. member and yet you are asking like novice dude. Okay, lets change the question do you think if you buy a ticket in the airplane were the price cost 100$ and in your cash on hand is only 99$, will the cashier will allow you to give the ticket? Always remember that rules is a rule which is equivalent of constitution. So if you want to get the stakes, I guess you better comply it perfectly the task weekly, just very simple as that.

The logic that you give to the question that is asked is indeed acceptable, but there is no harm in expressing it like the colleague above.
because I have experienced the reality of what the partners questioned above, when one time I followed the signature because I could not complete the post according to the rules that had been made.
whether it was because of the kindness of the manager's bounty at that time, I also did not know but the fact that the manager bounty only gave a number of posts that did not match the amount but still gave value, even though it was not full.
only the number of posts at that time was shared with the conditions.
So actually back to the manager bounty too.