Quote from: iasenko on March 20, 2019, 09:34:06 AM

Quote from: DeepOnion-DevTeam on March 20, 2019, 09:31:34 AM

need a verification

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I'm the owner DeepOnion-DevTeam bitcointalk.org User ID - 2565496, today is March 20, 2019. Signing a message to stake an address

12Vkg6Ex4GjbC7bZ3tMoVVgR5WQkTSYLEE
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
IAcE0QloLmiqPbuYre8uWrIHKux8sL8YvpPk4n0cN4HMXigLfMtVzTHJUh1XvQd8VynLOfxR8toGUVN 8ly8eOvw=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Quoted, but

Quote

Message verified to be from 1BVbZnccYZkgsbA1a6VKZ6KcbApW2KQFFb (address wasn't specified)

Here is your singed message without the missing address:
DELETED

That is not correct... no-one should trust that message with the 1BVb address... It would appear that the user has simply posted the message/address/signature incorrectly, if we re-arrange it into the "standard" format used by BrainwalletX, and use:

Quote

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I'm the owner DeepOnion-DevTeam bitcointalk.org User ID - 2565496, today is March 20, 2019. Signing a message to stake an address
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
12Vkg6Ex4GjbC7bZ3tMoVVgR5WQkTSYLEE
IAcE0QloLmiqPbuYre8uWrIHKux8sL8YvpPk4n0cN4HMXigLfMtVzTHJUh1XvQd8VynLOfxR8toGUVN 8ly8eOvw=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Then it verifies OK with the original address... So, I would suggest that DeepOntion-DevTeam repost their message using the correct format.