Quote from: TECSHARE on March 22, 2019, 04:57:01 AM

Quote from: bones261 on March 21, 2019, 09:35:18 PM

Quote from: TECSHARE on March 21, 2019, 02:26:50 AM

Quote from: The Pharmacist on March 21, 2019, 01:29:14 AM

Quote from: TECSHARE on March 21, 2019, 01:22:42 AM

Eh, okay. Then don't expect anyone to reply to any of your accusations, as nobody has any obligation to do so. Debate over.

[waves magic wand] aaand debate open again

I never asked for any of your commentary. I did however pose a direct question to Nutilduuh. None of your childish demands that I answer to this weird interrogation designed to distract from the fact that Nutilduuh tried to sell their account change anything.

The fact is Nutilduuh was ready to sell out this user base and expose them to scams for money, and this behavior would be grounds for total loss of reputation if Nutilduuuh wasn't protected by people like you who refuse to act on it and would be ready to act in retaliation if anyone bothered to hold them to the same standards they hold others to.

Exactly when did the Pharmacist become a DT member? I'm not certain why us newer Dt members need to sift through old garbage looking for people to tag. I already went through the archived secolgs and did not find that Nutilda changed their password between October 2016 when he opened the thread and August 2017, after he announced the account was no longer for sale. I don't see why any new account holder would not change their password after obtaining the account and attempting to throw us off the scent by announcing the account was no longer for sale. I suppose that original Nutilda could have posted it and then sold it on the down low. However, it already took me an inordinate amount of time to sift through the old seclogs looking for changed password. If anyone cares to take over, so be it. I for one am not going to red tag an account that was offered for sale 3 years ago and then the sale retracted, when it appear to be a case of no harm, no foul. Perhaps if this was a fresh incident, I would have tagged it.

Who said they need to? The fact is they do this on a regular basis, especially when it comes to people that speak out about being abused by them and no one ever has an issue with it. Now that it is one of the in crowd suddenly everyone is making excuses for them and defending them, but if it was anyone else they would be red tagged with zero controversy. The fact is Nutilduuh intended to allow this forums users to be robbed because they wanted money. It is also a fact no one knows for sure if it was sold or not, and this would be more than enough justification to totally remove any reputation for that account. Unfortunately there are a set of standards for the trust mob and their toadies, and a standards for everyone else.

I have no reputation to remove. As far as my rep shows to you, it should be a nice red color since iCEBREAKER is in your trust list. All for reasons you deem "fair." Also, there is no "standard" for how to deal with a 3 year old attempt at a sale of one's own account, as the issue had never arisen before you made it an issue.

There's also no way to prove to you that the account is still in my hands. There are ways to prove it to other people who are willing to entertain rational thought, but since the whole reason for you being here is because of a personal vindictiveness, you do not fall into this category.

Quote from: tranthidung on March 22, 2019, 04:44:23 AM

Is it time for me to lock the topic, today?
I started the topic, but have not had anything to discuss.
Additionally, the case of @nutildah solved long days ago (two weeks ago). Lips sealed

As tecshare has never lost an argument (or even a debate), he will continue posting in this thread for all of eternity. I would say please do and let tecshare open his own thread about me.