Quote from: LoyceV on March 22, 2019, 10:40:55 AM

Quote from: RHavar on March 21, 2019, 08:44:36 PM

Quote from: LoyceMobile on March 21, 2019, 08:27:08 PM

I think the loophole is going to be that I didn't buy the tokens. But if that's the excuse, it means apparently some tokens are more equal than others.
I'm just speculating here, and would love to hear the real reason.

I've heard in private from who have bought tokens and lost money, but it's not my place to name them (especially if they are angling to have Dean to privately honor the original terms of their sale).

But I do find it amusing the audacity of saying "no one lost money" after selling millions of dollars worth of tokens that went on to lose ~99% of their value and the majority (supposedly) were bought back at considerably under their sale price (i.e. when it was profitable for Dean to buy them back).

Lol, just as expected, there it is:

Quote from: BetKing.io on March 22, 2019, 10:16:28 AM

(note Loyce didn't even buy tokens in the ico, he got them from bounty)

Your BKB tokens allow you to have access to information that scammer Dean Nolan will not provide to other investors and non-investors

Your tokens are not "lesser than other tokens" just because you received them in bounty.

You should ask that scammer Dean Nolan about how much bankroll remains and how much of the 50% of the ICO funds that were supposed to be used for "marketing, promotions, seo, design, development, server costs and legal"

And of course the main question about how many of the tokens bought in the buy-back with the 600 BTC actually belonged to investors and hoe many belonged to scammer Dean Nolan