alice the blackmailer and bob the victim yes or no?
Bob is
a victim, not
the victim. Alice is a victim of Bob's robbery and Bob is a victim of Alice's blackmail. It is, after all, possible for criminals to themselves be victims of crime; didn't your mother ever tell you that two wrongs don't make a right? I
already explained why this is the case, despite your attempt to delete my post in your self-moderated thread. (Whatever happened to that FREE SPEECH stuff you keep going on about?)
This is the problem you see. I advocate free speech for everyone. You just insist on free speech for you and your pals and self moderate and local rule me into silence. After trying to to sshh me up with red trust and bans. Forget this for now we can have a different thread about that. You can open a thread for free speech else where.
So here we get to it.
This is the problem, to me BOB is not a victim AT ALL. This is stupid there is no point in this analogy where we can say BOB is a victim.
On top of this. You take it further in that you want to punish ONLY Alice and REWARD BOB.
Your reasoning and yoggs and tmans and laudas is corrupt and you should not be near the DT system at all.
Suchmoon is trying to derail. There is no end in sight to the net negative shit that spews all over this board. She only wants to derail this thread because she knows where it is headed.
Now explain why BOB is at any point a victim that needs a reward whilst Alice is in the wrong and deserving of punishment.
@FH - this does sound like one solution but then DT will say ALICE is a murderer so certainly untrustworthy.