Quote from: Roger_Murdock on February 09, 2014, 01:14:37 AM

Quote from: Ducky1 on December 30, 2013, 10:23:19 PM

My alternative approach - log vs log(log) from 01.11.2011 to present. Conclusion: The log-log model seems to better fit the data than the linear-log model, and according to this model we are actually slightly under the trend line. Comments?

You know, I'm starting to suspect we might not be following the super-exponential trendline.

Just kidding. $10,000 in May for sure.

Not sure if this was posted in seriousness, but with the "crash" this week only falling to around $650 to $700 this puts us closer to the log-log model I would think? Of course it is part wishful thinking, but then I think that we are just barely into 2014 and if the "low" price is where we are supposed to be in June according to the Log-linear growth line we are looking at a faster rate of growth here.

And that said, the price right now could be undervalued, as hard as that is to believe!