Quote from: MiningBuddy on September 04, 2011, 08:16:50 AM

Quote from: the joint on September 04, 2011, 08:11:56 AM

Quote from: indio007 on September 04, 2011, 04:44:34 AM

Here we go...

1. Promote pseudo legalese
2. Attack the victim
3. Huh

4. Profit!

What's wrong , the first line of attack failed , so now you guys are now going to trot out a red herring as a distraction? All he did was compile publicly available information and consolidate it in one place. If the dude wasn't a thief he wouldn't have the problems.

Out of curiosity, do we know for absolute certain that the Intersango guy didn't simply create multiple user names on chat, an account on Intersango, and send the coins to himself and then "argue" with himself and try to convince us all that he was really the victim and not the profiteer?

$4,000+ is a fair sum of cash, and with all the scams going on nowadays...

Just making sure and wondering if anyone considered it.

Intersango have already stated they will cover all lost customer funds, so no, I don't see this theory being plausible.

I am still not taking sides, but this logic is just too ridiculous not to make fun of...By your reckoning, he can cover the 'lost funds' so there is no way that he still may control the 'lost funds'.