Quote from: RAJSALLIN on February 09, 2014, 11:02:22 AM

I personally think you were just to active in these forums and should just have released your coin anonymously. As is now I see the problem in doing that.

Indeed.

However I am not as pessimistic on the possibility of the market need being fulfilled soon.

Listen to this audio to see in their own words how totalitarian the US government has become behind the curtain. Wikipedia says she was the prime suspect in the Benghazi fiasco which is part of this push Middle East towards the world currency.

http://armstrongeconomics.com/2013/09/04/syria-benghazi-connection/

I see no need to reply to blablahblah's latest (naive or intentional?) post. He has a preference for centralized outcomes. I am sure readers have enough information already to formulate an accurate appraisal.

Quote from: blablahblah on February 09, 2014, 10:59:57 AM

Quote from: AnonyMint on February 08, 2014, 09:17:25 PM

Quote from: blablahblah on February 08, 2014, 08:21:13 PM

Your prejudice against all things centralised or structured "top down" (aka: weasel words for social structures that you emotionally dislike),

I shouldn't need to point out the blatantly obvious...

The premise of the OP is the internet is decentralized

It's geographically distributed and that's what makes the Internet useful.

Because no nation controls it, i.e. decentralized. And there are other freedoms that come from it being decentralized, e.g. free speech of self-publishing such as blogs. And many other decentralized freedoms. The rest of your post shows you still don't understand how centralization destroys freedom, fitness, and leads to horrific failure. We already had that debate in the Mad Max thread. I will not tolerate the redundancy (thus noise) of unnecessarily repeating the same debate in this thread.