Quote from: Lolliedieb on April 02, 2019, 08:43:37 AM

Quote from: restless on March 27, 2019, 08:56:30 AM

Any solution for
"No OpenCL devices found in your system. " ?
on Nvidia systems (Win10)

Well it seems that the Nvidia OpenCL drivers are missing. In the most recent Nvidia drivers it should ship with the driver, before the OpenCL component was part of the Cuda Toolkit. Maybe a quick re-install of driver already fixes this.

Quote from: OJDrinker on March 29, 2019, 06:20:54 AM

Does anyone have lolminer 0.5? It said 0.7 was faster so I deleted it without checking (like an idiot) and 0.7 is slower for MNX for me. Undelete didn't work, it was already overwritten.

Oh, on what card is that? Something that should not have happened - well each card is different, the MNX part could get a big rework any ways ...
Anyways I will have a look if I find the 0.5 to upload it again.

Quote from: joeykolb on March 30, 2019, 08:45:20 AM

WHAT IS THE RIGHT CONFIG? for vidulum
its done , working on zergpool
..only its disconnecting a lot, and reconnects , saying:Warning: index out of bounds

--coin VDL is the right config for it

But that reconnects should not be. Out of bounds means somehow the pool sending less parameters then the miner expects. I will have a check if there is something wrong with the stratum.

Quote from: laik2 on March 31, 2019, 02:36:23 PM

Quote from: Docice on March 31, 2019, 02:17:18 PM

I dont understand why to use this miner on red ones, if these algos are for green ones ?! Even 1050ti faster than rx580. My personal opinion is that this miner is for siphoning money for the developer. Unfortunately, this miner has no competition. We would see a different speed, a vivid example of this is the lyra2z algorithm.

You are driving far away from your competition. Id advise you to think before post or accuse.

Well ... what to say about this. Nothing best.
I have to admit my code may not be fastest, but there are barely opportunities to learn from. But same way: If its slow then I do not earn any thing, because there are better things to mine, so somehow it should be fair?
I can for example say that in October and November with 144/5 and Aion together I made about 350$ - clearly because my Nvidia codes were not so quick as the closed source Cuda miners and on AMD there was no competition but better mining opportunities. So for me the 350 was kind of fair , especially when considering that I do that not full time and its more a hobby. Else I could not justify putting up to 100 hours per month into this.

Regarding the Speed: I am sure a few more % are possible, but also that its not easy to achieve it - else won't there be others trying to do it - or just do it? Devs follow the path where the money is, you saw that at gminer who gave AMD support for Beam because with that you can earn money - but are they faster? No.

I could explain why AMD does so hard at Equihash coins but that would be too technical right now. Hint: cache line size and the more difficult to make writing coalesced.

Quote from: Kep2077 on March 31, 2019, 11:26:58 PM

Any chance that new release will contain new asm kernels for GPUs like Hawaii ?

I can do more ASM kernels, but at the moment only on ROCm, because that allows inline asm. But not got the impression many were willing to change driver for the higher speed. Unfortunately my attempts to make same work with normal drivers failed so far - and doing that experiments took me weeks of testing :/

On 'mainstream gpu' level nVidia is superior, but the HBM/HBM2 versions of AMD cards pull their own pretty well. I got my old R9 Fury running and as long as you know what you are doing with mem/core clock and power limits you can squeeze out very reasonable hash/W. That said, nowhere near nVidia if you include hardware costs.