Quote from: ICOEthics on March 27, 2019, 05:26:44 PM

Quote from: Dago-mining on March 10, 2019, 07:56:45 AM

Quote from: nutildah on March 10, 2019, 04:13:26 AM

Quote from: unceprova on March 09, 2019, 09:50:34 PM

Quote from: nutildah on March 09, 2019, 05:18:43 PM

Your white paper is filled with plagiarism. You've quoted at least 4 different sources and mixed them together, probably would have been faster just to write your own content.

For example, from your whitepaper:

Quote

Concept: Higher mining difficulty

Bitcoin mining difficulty is adjusted, every blocks to remain at roughly 10 minutes per block. As more mining capacity is brought online, the difficulty increases accordingly. Thus difficulty increases proportionally to the increase in computing power of the network. The mining difficulty of both Ether and Bitcoin has increased exponentially since their respective genesis blocks.

This trend will likely continue as adoption keeps increasing. Therefore, digital currency miners will have to constantly acquire more powerful mining equipment. The times where everyone could mine Bitcoin with his/her
personal computer are long over.

The rising mining difficulty has forced miners to keep buying new and more powerful mining equipment. The problem is that these super-computers are also very expensive, creating a significant barrier to entry that only those with deep pockets can overcome. Mining benefits greatly from economies of scale, which further limits the ability of small-time miners to be competitive.

Because of this, mining has become heavily centralized. AntPool claims to be the largest crypto-currency cloud mining company in the world, controlling 15.5 percent of the hash power of the Bitcoin network. Most mining
companies are located in China due to the low cost of electricity and labor.

From an article on altcointoday.com:

Quote

Rising Difficulty

Bitcoin mining difficulty is adjusted every 2016 blocks to remain at roughly 10 minutes per block. As more mining capacity is brought online, the difficulty increases accordingly. Thus difficulty increases proportionally to the increase in computing power of the network.

The mining difficulty of both Ether and Bitcoin has increased exponentially since their respective genesis blocks. This trend will likely continue as adoption keeps increasing. Therefore, digital currency miners will have to constantly acquire more powerful mining equipment. The times where everyone could mine Bitcoin with his/her personal computer are long over.

Higher Difficulty=More Powerful Equipments

The rising mining difficulty has forced miners to keep buying new and more powerful mining equipment. The problem is that these super-computers are also very expensive, creating a significant barrier to entry that only those with deep pockets can overcome. Mining benefits greatly from economies of scale, which further limits the ability of small-time miners to be competitive.

Because of this, mining has become heavily centralized. AntPool claims to be the largest cryptocurrency cloud mining company in the world, controlling 17.82 percent of the hashpower of the Bitcoin network. Most mining companies are located in China due to the low cost of electricity and labor.

Care to explain why you've decided to copy your material word-for-word from another source?

I do not think it is plagiarism, many ICO use various definitions already present on the internet to explain the concept of a word such as: what is bitcoin? what is blockchain?
The most reasonable explanation is found and adapts to their concept and I believe yes, have been faster just to write your own content.
we waiting for a response from the team... Wink

This is plagiarism. Its word-for-word copying/pasting from another source. The only time when it would be considered acceptable is if it is standard legal terms. This demonstrates the team is not willing to invest time into creating their own content for their white paper, which is a hallmark of a scam project.

If I was considering being an investor in this project I would simply move on to one of the hundreds of others without a plagiarized white paper.

Hi Nutidah, we are sorry that you think of plagiarism. Unfortunately the analyzes, the numbers listed and the situation are those. We have preferred to use research by the most authoritative people of us, published on reliable Press, and we mention the sources on the Whitepaper in the Reference section. It would have been much worse to gather information and pass it off for us, it would have been a deception. We do not take merit that is not ours, CPS technology have not invented we rely on a company with years of experience in the construction of CPS power plants, the miners ASIC builds them a laboratory for us (for now), the information must be verifiable by everyone on the network. Or do we have to pretend to be Gurus with news created by us, imaginative and abstract, not verifiable, written only to deceive everyone, promise solutions created by a writer paid by us to problems created ad hoc? Our project is simple and brilliant at the same time, the problem of pollution is real and verifiable by everyone on thousands of sites, and with existing technologies, even verifiable we can mitigate it without giving up big profits.

Does your project has anything to do with Envion ?

It appears that your whitepaper was copied from Envion's whitepaper.

wp archived

Hi ICOEthics, on page 39 of the whitepaper we mentioned the sources. We used those articles because they are more known and reliable sources. No, we have nothing to do with Envion, their project was not reliable from the beginning, the cooling was with a gas but the container had an enome fan (?), The miners heat up a lot, who would have reloaded the gas cylinders? Which power plant would have ever sold energy below cost, in Italy envion had quoted ENEL that after 2 days he denied (are companies that have to make profits with energy), the land where to lay the container who would rent it? The night with what energy would Minnig have? Envion had an excellent Marketing system that shifted attention, their system was invented by them and therefore not verifiable, there was no feedback, other than those provided by them. Our project is simple, not easy to implement, but simple, everyone can control what the CSP is, the difference is that the land, the energy is ours, we are not dependent on anyone.