Quote from: Samboo on April 01, 2019, 07:45:25 AM

I do not know much about merit system. But I agree with you to some extent on this point. Stake allocations should be fair I think. But it is based on the terms and condition set by a project. I have also seen many projects allocating stakes not much far in volumes between all members. But one thing is true that at present, gaining merits are very much hard for newbies.

Read above your comment. Signature participants are paid on the space they have on signature. That is why it is called signature campaign. It is the same as the number of follower in twitter or the number of views on an article campaign and same goes to facebook friends and followers in a facebook campaign. More followers, viewers = more stake. If you still don't get it.. I do not know how to explain it.

This greatly explain it just so you do not have to browse up

Quote from: eagleman on April 01, 2019, 07:18:53 AM

The stakes depends on the signature space.

The space provided by senior member and hero members are more visible and bigger than the lower ranks.

@OP kindly check these :

In the previous system a member must meet the ff and spend the no. of days to acquire it.:

30 activities equivalent to be a jr. member (at least 30 days)
60 activities to be a member (at least 60 days)
120 activities to be a full member (at least 120 days)
240 activities to be a Sr. member (at least 240 days)
480 activities to be a Hero Member (at least 480 days)
and from 820 if activities I am not mistaken, you have a random chance to be a legendary Member,

assuming the member is active daily, he have to wait more than a year to be a hero member

See the difference now? and the new system made it even harder since member need to meet 2 requirement, activities and merit.

to be able to get that amount of space on the signature campaign, higher ranks need to meet these stuff, so why would a jr. member stakes be equal to higher member's stakes?