Quote from: Big Naturals on April 03, 2019, 11:55:52 PM

Quote from: oblox on April 03, 2019, 11:09:36 PM

Quote from: Big Naturals on April 03, 2019, 12:14:10 PM

Quote from: oblox on April 03, 2019, 12:01:44 PM

Quote from: Big Naturals on April 03, 2019, 07:09:01 AM

Quote from: oblox on April 03, 2019, 04:39:24 AM

Quote from: Big Naturals on April 03, 2019, 02:25:33 AM

dPoW is a hybrid version of proof of stake where KMD investors get to decide who runs NN

No.

KMD investors decide who runs 64 notaries, so saying dPoW is a HYBRID VERSION of PoS is valid IMO

1 VOTE = 1 KMD

No, you aren't directly generating blocks. Nothing about your existing UTXOs influences block generation. Of the NN's you elect, they are still mining POW as well. It's a poor statement and only serves to cause confusion about KMD from people doing their DD.

Ok, give a definition of dPoW without mentioning how the notaries are selected then, is that how you propose to rid people of confusion?

You must be a troll, anyone doing DD who doesn't appreciate 64 NN are elected based on 1KMD = 1 VOTE would call komodo a scam shitcoin,

"proof of jl777's buddies in discord"

I think you need to better educate yourself what POS actually is. No one is arguing the election of notaries. Finally, I suggest you actually reread what I posted instead of diving off the deep end.

Stop trolling ...

"dPoW is a hybrid version of proof of stake where KMD investors get to decide who runs NN"

Why do you want to confuse people? I know what dPoW is, and how PoS works, don't be so literal, otherwise you are just trolling

NN selection is STAKE BASED

edit: if I said dPoW is a version of PoS you would be correct, but I didn't say that. You are trolling to suggest otherwise

lol, except that it has nothing to do with proof of stake. Stake-based =/= Proof of Stake. Your stake, represented by the coins you get 1:1 vote with (or your direct KMD for that matter), do not generate blocks themselves, nor do the NN's via POS.

As for your edit "if I said dPoW is a version of PoS you would be correct, but I didn't say that". Ummm? "dPoW is a hybrid version of proof of stake" So you inserted hybrid and that is suppose to change the core statement? Really?

And trolling? If correcting a nonsensical statement that is only going to serve as a statement of confusion makes me a troll, so be it. I'm probably one of the larger holders here.