Quote from: AdolfinWolf on April 16, 2019, 08:03:07 PM

Quote from: The-One-Above-All on April 16, 2019, 07:42:43 PM

<...We can observe in the full context...>

Quote from: cryptohunter on April 05, 2019, 11:59:41 PM

<<<>>>
So here we observe suchmoon breaking my local rules.

Quote from: cryptohunter on April 04, 2019, 05:59:29 PM

The difference is this bunch of snitching scum report my posts and I hardly ever report their groundless and false accusation attacks on me first. Since snitching is only for the lowest of the low as we can observe.

Quote from: cryptohunter on March 30, 2019, 10:07:27 PM

c/ this supporting of observable shady deeds and those committing them is unlikely to result in a ban as the OP is requesting because we can observe other mods openly support those who commit shady deeds and

Quote from: cryptohunter on March 23, 2019, 06:45:59 PM

Lets analyse what we observe so far in this thread.

Quote from: cryptohunter on March 15, 2019, 12:18:10 AM

Although that is the same for most of the meta club as we can observe.

Quote from: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5116287.msg50003192#msg50003192

Their untrustworthy prior deeds that are there for all to observe.

I've never seen two persons use a form of "observe" so frequently, and in such an unnatural manner... Coincidence? Roll Eyes

Any reason why you're not just posting from your main account?

This observably demonstrates, that you are unnaturally slow. I have been trying my "uttermost" to continue the true legends work, in his true image. Thank you for the late recognition. Please let me know, if I make any posts that are not instantly recognizable as cryptohunter's style. When, and if, I notice him posting again. Then I will continue only with his explicit permission.. What;s with all the wolf people, and cat enthusiasts in meta? I am making an concerted effort, to address you all with the titles true legend cryptohunter bestowed upon you. I see no title for you. Sorry if I have missed that somewhere.

Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on April 16, 2019, 08:01:18 PM

Quote from: The-One-Above-All on April 16, 2019, 07:42:43 PM

Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on April 16, 2019, 07:35:23 PM

Misleading and sneaky reply from a sneaky person. Trying to present things out of context.

This is exactly what I am talking about, and exactly what this entire thread is all about. You are using insults and fake quotes to attack me instead of addressing the points I have made.

If you can't even follow your own local rules, then you have no right to complain when others don't either. Similarly, if you go around constantly insulting people and derailing other people's threads, then complaining about the same behavior when it happens to you is unlikely to be taken seriously.

You are misrepresenting what happened on the thread. So no, those are not insults. They are statements of important truth. You are taking it out of context, you are misleading people. There are 2 options. You are stupid and do not realize what you are doing. Or you are being sneaky. Can you suggest a 3rd option?

Calling a liar a liar is not an insult when they are lying. That is telling an important truth. Saying someone is misleading others if they are misleading them, is not an insult it is an important piece of information.

My point stands. The very people complaining about personal attacks are those attacking others trust scores and their threads FIRST. Often with false accusations and groundless insults, that fall apart under examination. I guess politeness and insults are different things again, that is a different debate.
Personal attacks should be avoided, by all parties, if possible. However, imagine being at a party, and 4 different guys are offering a drunk girl a lift home. You know 1 has been convicted of rape and murder previously. At times a conversation or debate may require certain past events to be mentioned for the optimal solution. Eventually after listening to the convicted rapist and murderer explain he lives closer, it is less out of his way, and he has a faster car. Then you may need to mention something off topic and irrelevant like : but didn't you rape and murder the last girl you gave a lift home from a party? I know it is insulting and spoils the mood, but if you want the optimal solution or outcome; then at times, factual historical events must be mentioned and presented for consideration. I know it is a personal attack, but if you have evidence and it is important, then in those cases it can be warranted. You must present a compelling case with evidence and a strong connection ensuring the optimal outcome.