but something tells me they don't see themselves as some kind of sporting referee who needs to enforce rules based on judgement calls and "send off" offending parties.
yet even before rules even changed. devs have and DID code stuff to send off parties that they disagrd with purely because those parties were not interested in a certain proposal.
P.S definetly keeping this quote for context of other topic lip flops in regards to your opinion on controversial apartheid causing forks to fake activation thresholds(think you for digging your own hole deeper)
Ah, how joyously predictable. The inept troll thinks sending valid transactions conforming to the network rules is an identical situation to running a client proposing incompatible network rules which had the potential to result in the loss of users funds and was a clear security risk to the network. It's almost like I saw it coming and posted it just to point out what an utter moron he is when he inevitably posted to claim it's somehow a flip-flop when it isn't.
If I'm digging a hole, it's for a dipshit like you to walk right into. Well done. Way to fall straight in the trap.