Quote from: franky1 on April 08, 2019, 08:04:34 PM

Quote from: DooMAD on April 08, 2019, 05:51:59 PM

Quote from: franky1 on April 08, 2019, 04:04:55 PM

you keep on insinuating that my words on this forum are somehow affecting the network. you insinuate it by emotionally mentioning how im appealing and asking for peoples permission...

Wrong on both counts.
Secondly, you are the one playing the logical fallacy with your ongoing appeal to pity, which is an emotional appeal.

you literally debunked yourself

Quote from: DooMAD on April 08, 2019, 12:24:04 PM

I don't need your consent. You are delusional if you think I do.

Your ongoing appeal to pity that other people would have to wait for your permission to do something,

You seem to live in some sort of dream world where your opinions are important and that people should somehow be required to consider your delicate feelings.

"required" "permission" "appealing".... thats your words..
this is a discussion forum about bitcoin. it is not the bitcoin network that uses consensus. my opinions are just a discussion. it is you that is getting emotional and insulting and trying to make out that my discussion is somehow powerful.

all i ever tell people is just to do their own research and try to avoid becoming anti-bitcoiners like you and your echo chamber that just want to do social drama emotional stuff to then promote alternative networks

plus. learn consensus
consensus is about unifying people. not having excuses to throw people off the network
you really have no clue about what the byzantine generals theory is, or how satoshi's solution to it is actually the opposite of 'throw everyone off'

i truly believe in the real world you would be seen as a person who has many prejudices and is probably racist by the tone your messages on this forum show as to how to react to people of opposing stance to you

Quote from: DooMAD on April 08, 2019, 05:51:59 PM

But please, keep telling us how Bitcoin would be better if we accepted your double-standard where other clients can remove us from their network at any given moment of their choosing,

your so emotional that you are actually flip floping so much you are forgetting which path your following and what path your suppose to be debating.
its YOU that has been saying that its ok to do network affecting 'send off' (controversial forks) prior to bip activations, purely to achieve a bip activation by faking the threshold requirement.

so how about do yourself a small favour, take a few days to refresh yourself, have a break. chill out, calm down. and use the time to learn about bitcoin from actual research. and by bitcoin i mean bitcoin 2009-2013.. (not from the prospective(prospectus) of core)
learn things like byzantine generals theory, consensus, as it would help you to learn the whole purpose of blockchains and how the network should be decentralised and not just a core distribution.

then you might start grasping how blockchains have a purpose and function that LN does not. and how LN is not secure. then learn about LN practically and pragmastically rather than the delusions or promotional buzzwords.

once you gain a good scope of understanding the technology. then try to form discussions about the tech. without the emotional social drama of ignoring the tech just to argue with humans that are not coding the network.
in other words. if your trying to insult a person rather than tech or devs. your not doing things right

A consensus protocol that can unify the globe for a value transfer can only work if it does the minimum of what is bespoke, the smallest intersection the masses can agree upon.

Peer to peer electronic cash.

On chain

Scalable as much as possible that anyone can use it

The design for this exists for 10 years now.

Designing a protocol does not need devs. Btw. Maybe refactoring and bug fixing, but the consensus is dev free territory