doublec had every right to make a closed-source application for his business.
I don't see anywhere in my post where make the claim he did not have this right. So this appears to me to be a strawman argument.
Straw man argument? Nope.
You used as a point of argument that someone supported doublec's closed source application, and implied that meant their disapproval of the SolidCoin license change was disingenuous. Your exact words: "The exchanges you mentioned are closed source, so you in one breath are praising close sourced applications and demanding he remain open source."
You made a completely invalid "point" and I simply explained why it was invalid.