Quote from: BitcoinEXpress on September 05, 2011, 01:29:18 AM

it is possible to like closed source and open source simultaneously LOL. Double C never represented his exchange as open source then closed it, Coinhunter/Realcoin certainly did.

I don't think I made the claim that you couldn't I just thought it just appeared to me that the logic didn't pan out. I could have misunderstood. Not that I believe Realsolid did the right thing (I certainly support open source), it should be noted that under the MIT license he is capable of doing what he did legally, so if it is successful (which I personally believe it won't be) I don't see why it matters if you don't have a preference. Which appears to me to be your new claim, but I may be misunderstanding again.

Quote from: BitcoinEXpress on September 05, 2011, 01:29:18 AM

and the answer to your original question, Try and use it sometime.

I do use it, even when I'm traveling and it appears to work without flaw for me. Do you have any substantial criticism that would actually help me improve the project? Because I would appreciate it.

Quote from: BitcoinEXpress on September 05, 2011, 01:29:18 AM

Also, trying to run a serious financial site with a .in, are you serious??? Huh

MtGox.com, Bitparking.com, btc-e.com, ruxum.com, tradehill.com, paypal.com, libertyreserve.com.......See a pattern here?

Maybe it's just me but .in and anything financial is huge red flag.

Do you really think having a different tld then what is currently (and it won't be once the DNS servers open up every possible combination) makes my site any less secure? If this is your only real legitimate criticism I feel like I'm doing well.

Quote from: BitcoinEXpress on September 05, 2011, 01:29:18 AM

You asked, I responded

That is what typically happens in civil discussions but I have this suspicion you are not interested in a civil discussion.