Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Re: Red trust on Bestmixer: is this justified?
by
LoyceV
on 14/04/2019, 19:18:40 UTC
All 3 red tags has been removed, and replaced by 2 neutral tags:
Image loading...
With that, this thread has served it's purpose, and I'll lock it.



However, many questions that didn't really belong in this topic are still unanswered:

Exhibit A
Here is a quote from their website why there is no information about their staff or company:
~
So in short: they are fully anonymous, they don't store your data, they aren't registered under any jurisdiction and they answer to nobody.
Isn't that the same for any mixer? Many exchanges are enforcing KYC, because governments demand it. I don't think a mixer can remain anonymous if they have a known office address.

Quote
Now read section 4 and 8 from their ToS: https://bestmixer.io/en/terms
4. Looks to me like a legal disclaimer, hoping they stay off the radar for US authorities. Where I live, many bank accounts have similar requirements: they don't want to be involved in US taxes.
That is a bit weird though when the mixer is anonymous. It looks like it's copied from one of many websites, such as healthmonitor.io.

8. It is getting weirder indeed Shocked They've listed all possible reasons why you would ever want to use a mixer Tongue
It looks like it's copied from Adyen.com
Bitmix.biz and many other sites use the same terms.

I would like to get an answer from Bestmixer about those terms
(this was ignored by Bestmixer)

Exhibit B
I checked out your website and I found some contradictions on it:

Quote
We want to be free on the Internet. All of our rights and obligations are based on the principles of crypto-democracy which we have to form together with you.

Quote
Owing to blockchain technology which ensures trust between us and the client without the need for any third party intervention or mediating government agency, we ultimately have no need of registering in the pursuit of keeping anonymity and freedom alive on the internet.

Quote
And, most importantly, since our service is completely anonymous and we are answerable to no one but the client whom we serve, we will do whatever is necessary to keep the confidentiality of every transaction regardless of where in the world they originate from or what the government policies in those countries may be.

Your terms of service says otherwise:







Could you explain why you are claiming to offer fully anonimity and freedom, answer to no one/government policies and serve customers from anywhere in the world while your terms of service basically forbids every reason why someone would want to use a mixer?
(BestMixer responded but ignored the (off-topic) question:)

TheNewAnon135246, your question does not correspond to the topic of this thread.

Perhaps your second question will find its answer later when members Lauda and LeGaulois react to the main question of this thread regarding the red trust.

I would still like to have these questions answered, but it shouldn't be in this topic anymore. I'll leave this topic unlocked to allow use of the quote button in case someone wants to create a new thread.