Quote from: veleten on April 14, 2019, 08:16:04 PM

Quote from: Coinbox1 on April 14, 2019, 02:48:16 PM

Quote from: veleten on April 13, 2019, 10:30:36 AM

Quote from: lobcmt2 on April 12, 2019, 11:18:35 PM

Quote from: stomachgrowls on April 11, 2019, 02:12:09 PM

said that most of Sig campaign rules are just similar.

Rules in signature campaigns are nearly the same, in my opinion. There are so little difference in campaigns' rules, and mostly concentrate on payment rates, check days, total required minimum posts or maximum accepted posts to get paid, as well as acceptable boards to have countable posts. It looks good for TrustDice, so far, that they don't got accusation on plagiarism, or something like this. I don't have to much skills to find out such issues, but let's see the growth of TrustDice, and findings from community next few weeks.

there are differences in signature campaign , the rules depend on the manager and the site owner who ordered it
I don't see anyone accusing Trustdice of plagiarism though
I don't see them run a signature campaign just yet , correct me if I'm wrong
signature campaigns at Bitcointalk are a sort of some quality assurance mark for a casino
if they can afford 1 bitcoin+ to advertise , they should be focused on long term and not exit scam or something like that

We actually run signature campaign: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5129362.0.
I think it's also not too bad to test and run Signature campaign for a short time to see some results.
I personally agree that Signature campaign needs to be run for a quite long time.
By the way, what is the usage of Signature campaign on bitcointalk for projects?

as I have mentioned above- it is some kind of a quality mark and branding
to advertise at one of the most popular cryptoforums of the world means alot ( and costs alot too )
gambling sites use signature campaigns to get exposure and gamblers and to show that their brand is financially solid
some have been running such a campaign for years , for example the one I'm wearing
but huge sites and established brands like Bitsler or Stake can afford it and it is working for them
while the new sites should not expect miracles to happen once they run a signature campaign themselves
it can be good , it can be not so cost effective or it can also fail dramatically since if the site is not meeting the player's expectations -no adverting would be able to correct this

This is very good to know. I also want to believe that it(campaign) brings quality users in the long run. Otherwise, I highly doubt that it's only for branding and quality mark.