Quote from: TryNinja on April 14, 2019, 06:38:06 PM

Quote from: NowYouAreSee on April 14, 2019, 06:08:39 PM

You say that it is more profitable to use chipmixer, while all his transactions are easy to track down!
I'd rather pay 50% commission to bestmixer, but no one would know that I got the money from the mixer!

Thats funny for you to say after this post: Breaking Mixing Services

Quoting it:

Quote

I found some trivial bugs (timing attacks, leakages, xss, ...) through which nearly all relevant centralized bitcoin mixing services could be broken. Based on outgoing mixing transactions (transactions sent by the mixer) I was able to identify the correct incoming transactions sent by customers (vice versa). [...]

[...] In my thesis, I attacked coinmixer.se (at the time of writing it was the biggest centralized mixing service), however - except chipmixer.com1 - every other centralized mixing service I checked could be broken in a similar fashion.

While the author doesnt explicitly quotes BestMixers name, it is clear that BestMixer works exactly as the other traditional mixers (except that they charge huge fees for some extra privacy methods that no one can confirm if it works or if it even does anything at all).

You base your statements on conjectures.
Although in the case of chipmixer, we see simple evidence that their entire system works against their customers.