Quote from: CryptopreneurBrainboss on April 16, 2019, 12:42:35 PM

Sorry I'm against this idea, if this is some form of fund raising for charity it should be taken to the Service board or any other board where previous charity have been carried out then it'll get more support and mine too. I'm very sure serious members won't associate with this. This only portray the idea of merit competition which I don't think it is hygienic for the forum. You don't create quality post with the idea of getting merited but as a contribution in regards to quality discussion in the forum, getting merited is just a bonus.

No hate but just imagine this, some random user accepts the challenge he/she now knows all eyes are on his account. what does he do, he takes advantage of that and goes hurting in regards to creating quality content and in return gets merits and ranked up. Then what?, We shouldn't encourage creating quality content just because they want to rank up (receive) merit but because volunteering we want to add value to the forum. If users use ranking up as their main motivation to create quality post, they become liability to the forum when they achieve that goals as the motivation will be lost.

Thank you for your feedback. I was thinking a lot about the best place to post it and meta section seams the best for me for discussion about bitcointalk function which is merit system. Suggested by you Service Board seams to be far from accurate since I'm not offering any service here. Games and Rounds? ... do we really want to dig in charity topic into spam from gambling sites?

I understand your point about merit system. But does it matter for user who came here with question looking for an answer if he get it from "merit hunter" or "@Mather_Theresa". Does it matter if fireman extinguishes fire in your house for money or with mindset of helping others (and money as extra profit). Both are doing great job. I don't know if Wwzysocki is first or second one and it does not matter for me. I only challenged him to try to extinguish more fire this week (or as He choosed ... make more fire).

Quote from: cryptovigi on April 16, 2019, 11:21:54 AM

I know that it is not in accordance with the regulations that he has introduced(After challenge user, who was nominated has 24 to nominate the next person (be careful to who challenge you. prepared for that ;-))

but maybe he will agree...

I was thinking a lot that 1 challenge per week is not enought. Thats why i've change rules a little. From now on anyone can challenge anyone unless there is empty spot. I hope you guys find it fair for everyone (if not i'm open for discussion). That way your challenge is correct.

Quote from: cryptovigi on April 16, 2019, 11:21:54 AM

so, @Tytanowy Janusz - will you take the challenge ??

I accept the challenge. 19 merits left. Prepare your funds ... find good charity .. Because I'm going to smash it