Quote from: afbitcoins on April 19, 2019, 04:07:31 PM

Quote from: qwizzie on April 15, 2019, 04:53:58 PM

Quote from: lobcmt2 on April 15, 2019, 03:36:20 PM

I don't think inside the DASH topic, we should discuss about Bitcoin SV, shouldn't we?

i dont see why we cant discuss important events that impact one of our direct competitors with regards to on-chain scaling & following Satoshi "vision'
while showing the benefits of having a governance model in place (Dash) against lacking a governance model (Bitcoin),
leading to all sort of forks (Bitcoin SV, Bitcoin Gold, Bitcoin Diamond) and with it a lot of unnecessary drama.

Its mostly thanks to Bitcoin SV threathening behaviour during the so called "Hash Wars" that DCG started to prioritize ChainLocks development in order to
prevent 51% attacks on our network, so its not a bad idea i think to keep an eye on our competition .. specifically this one.

With a bit of luck Dash may actually rise up a rank on coinmarketcap thanks to this all. Not that coinmarketcap is all-leading,
but still... its a nice bonus.

I always thought it a bit of a travesty that SV, which is a fork of a fork of bitcoin was ahead of Dash in market cap in the first place.. and for what? The genius invention of a f**king massive blocksize and er.. thats it. A massive blocksize is the limit of the innovation. Compare that to Dash, innovator of masternodes, treasury, DAO, private send, instant send. All the adoption going on. ... etc. Compared to , duh make the blocks massive

Kraken is delisting them too.

this reminds me something like american sanctions on unfriendly countries. Despite of i will never buy SV, this is disgusting. Shame on them. (exchanges)