Quote from: Zeroxal on April 28, 2019, 02:04:57 PM

Quote from: minifrij on April 19, 2019, 06:34:13 PM

Quote from: OgNasty on April 19, 2019, 06:05:36 PM

Surely wasn't the type of talking you were doing in Slack the night of the extortion. Almost comical how much your tune has changed.

Go on then laughing boy, what was the type of talking I was doing? Can you provide some examples? Or should people just believe you because you are the big great OgNasty, that no mere mortal should ever dare question?

Quote from: OgNasty on April 19, 2019, 06:05:36 PM

You owe me & Zeroxal an apology for your role in supporting the failed extortion attempt as well as the lies you've repeated about me since and denials only show that you think your behavior is acceptable, which it isn't.

I've never even had anything like extortion suggested with you, so not sure which crevice you're pulling that chestnut from.

I've given you an apology in the past, regarding the way I would personally insult you, which I stood by until you continuously tried to pin me as some sort of criminal or scammer - neither of which I am. Considering that you keep trying to personally disrespect me by spreading lies about me, I'm by no means going to give you any respect. That will be the last, and only apology you get from me.

To Zeroxal: I'm sorry. I'm sorry that the whole thing happened to you, and I'm sorry that you had to go through what you did. And I'm sorry for if I had any part of it. While I know you will never read this, but I hope that you accept my apology and we can put this whole thing (that you seem to have already moved on from, two years ago) behind us.

I appreciate your apology and I accept it

Like you stated, I have moved on on this whole thing years ago.

Just bring some light to the whole case from my point of view:

Although minifrij wasn't directly involved with the whole case, he was pretty active on the side of the case. Instead of actively making subjective claims and accusations, he used information he gathered to come to his own conclusion, while still being very communicative with the ones who were directly involved. Hence the simultaneous actions being taken along with TMAN and Lauda within this forum (thread locking, ...). However, I cannot say for sure if he was assisting the others in their extortion attempt or not, but I can recall that while he tried to be as neutral as possible, his messages on slack were rather supportive to the "extortion ring" (might be because of peer pressure).

Although he never accused me directly, he did publish a thread in indirect efforts to ban my account with the reasoning of ban evasion, before locking it again after we tried to settle the case privately instead of making wild accusations throughout the forum... He reopened a thread requesting for me to be banned after I told him that theymos has cleared me of previous rule-breakings, just to have an official proof posted publicly.

Some could say that the possible threat of an account ban proposed by minifrij might be part of the whole extortion. But for me this whole thing has been settled years ago and in my eyes, minifrij has tried to be as neutral as possible in contrast to the others who just tried to hurt my reputation using their "witch hunt" method of scam accusations.

--

I can vouch for Og for being very supportive in such a situation while other people who trusted me previously were blinded by those fake accusations. He tried to be objective as possible and tried to cheer me up through the whole witch hunt. People who are still accusing Og for running a ponzi or being a trust abuser are like the witch hunters who tried to hurt me. There is a reason why his trust allows him to be a treasurer of this forum.

Ya, the crazy thing is that minifrij apologizes, and then continues his attacks if you don't obey his commands... Do you know how many times he's pretended to apologize, removed feedback, and then replaced it with nonsense ratings like the most recent here:

It's this constant attacking of innocent people over a period of years for pointing out his misbehavior and lack of trustworthiness that honestly is more concerning than the half-witted attempts to silence an extortion victim. He is clearly the guilty party in this situation, but yet it's my trust rating that is marked negative as he replaces his feedback regularly to give it more visibility. This is the sort of behavior that is detrimental to the trust system and he should be removed from DT2 for it. The trust system needs to be cleansed of users who do not follow it's intent and those who enable this behavior.